Get Outside BC

How do I apply?

Applications are now available for the 2012 project! If you are a BC resident, between the ages of 14 and 18, and willing and able to participate in all 3 phases of the project (see below), then you can apply! It is an all-expenses-paid project -- so travel, accommodations, etc. are all free! Fill out the application form and send it back to Elyse at getoutsidebc@cpawsbc.org by 6 pm on Monday, May 7, 2012. If you have any questions about the application form or the project, just e-mail Elyse or give her a call at 604 685 7445 ext. 25.

What is Get Outside BC?

Get Outside BC is a collaborative youth leadership project that aims to strengthen youth attachment to British Columbia’s parks by empowering young leaders across the province. 2011 was Get Outside BC's first year and it was a great success so we are holding the project again this year (2012). This year's project is a collaborative effort between CPAWS-BC, BC Parks, Mountain Equipment Co-op and Child and Nature Alliance of Canada.

What is the project's purpose?

The purpose of the project is to connect youth to the outdoors in a meaningful and sustainable way by giving them a sense of purpose and the capacity to inspire others to spend more time in the outdoors. The goal of the 3-phased project is to provide both a gateway experience for youth engagement with BC's outdoors and subsequent opportunities for engagement through youth-led follow-up events and the creation of a supportive youth network of natural leaders. Rather than providing a one-time experience, Get Outside BC aims to provide youth with the tools and resources to develop an enduring connection to the outdoors and a lifelong identity as a natural leader.

http://www.getoutsidebc.ca/

World Ocean’s Day Yoga with the Belugas at the Vancouver Aquarium!

World Ocean’s Day Yoga with the Belugas

Friday, June 08, 2012 - 8:00 AM

Join Ocean Wise and SeaChoice this World Oceans Day for a beluga inspired yoga adventure. Led by yogi, blissologist and ocean lover, Eoin Finn, this once in a lifetime yoga class will take place in the underwater beluga whale viewing area of the Vancouver Aquarium.With live musical talent, inspirational speakers and breakfast, this is one event not to miss!

http://tickets.vanaqua.org/Select.aspx?item=588&sch=123688

New picture of atomic nucleus emerges

New picture of atomic nucleus emerges

Enlarge

When most of us think of an atom, we think of tiny electrons whizzing around a stationary, dense nucleus composed of protons and neutrons, collectively known as nucleons. A collaboration between Argonne and Jefferson National Laboratories has demonstrated just how different reality is from our simple picture.

(PhysOrg.com) -- When most of us think of an atom, we think of tiny electrons whizzing around a stationary, dense nucleus composed of protons and neutrons, collectively known as nucleons. A collaboration between the U.S. Department of Energy's Argonne and Thomas Jefferson National Laboratories has demonstrated just how different reality is from our simple picture, showing that a quarter of the nucleons in a dense nucleus exceed 25 percent of the speed of light, turning the picture of a static nucleus on its head.

Ads by Google

Award Winning Anti-Spam - Barracuda Spam & Virus Firewall 5 Star Rated by SC Magazine - www.barracudanetworks.com

"We normally picture a nucleus as this fixed arrangement of , when in reality there's a lot going on at the subatomic level that we just can't see with a ," said Argonne physicist John Arrington.

Arrington and his colleagues used one of the Jefferson Lab's large magnetic to look at the behavior of nucleons in some light atoms—deuterium, helium, beryllium and carbon. Physicists had long believed that "short-range correlations"—the interactions within nuclei that produced high-momentum nucleons—would largely reflect the density of the atom's nucleus, as they did in heavier nuclei.

This hypothesis largely held true, except in the case of beryllium. Unlike the other atoms under investigation, beryllium contains two clusters of nucleons, each resembling a helium-4 nucleus. These nucleons, in turn, are bound to one additional neutron. Because of this somewhat unwieldy configuration, the nucleons in beryllium experienced a relatively high number of collisions despite being one of the least-dense nuclei.

The nuclear "speed boost" observed by the researchers may have resulted from the interaction between the quarks that compose the nucleons that come into contact with one another. Each proton and neutron consists of three quarks that are bound extremely tightly to one another. When nucleons get too close together, however, the forces that usually constrain quarks can get disrupted, modifying the quark structure of the protons and neutrons or possibly even forming composite particles from the quarks of two nucleons.

"Because the interaction between two closely spaced nucleons is responsible for both changes in momentum and quark behavior, I think it's imperative that scientists continue to study the phenomena that take place there," Arrington said. "Our next measurement will try to examine this question directly by taking a snapshot of the quark distributions at the moment when the nucleons are close together."

Provided by Argonne National Laboratory (news : web)

-->

http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-03-picture-atomic-nucleus-emerges.html

BuildingGreen.com LIVE: Army to Congress: LEED Doesn’t Cost More by Paula Melton on 02/02/2012

LIVE image

Army to Congress: LEED Doesn’t Cost More

Posted February 2, 2012 7:02 PM by Paula Melton
Related Categories: Mister Tristan Talks LEED

           

The Army is still going for Gold and Platinum despite recent legislation calling a halt to LEED spending.

The federal government has been one of the biggest supporters of LEED certification in the last few years, with the General Services Administration (GSA) requiring basic LEED certification for all federal buildings starting in 2003 and then upping that requirement to LEED Gold in 2010.

The military has been on the cutting edge of green building from the beginning. The Navy adopted sustainable design principles before LEED even existed, as we reported way back in 1998. The Army embraced LEED in 2006 and recently began the much more radical work of moving all its installations to net-zero energy, water, and waste. As Katherine Hammack, assistant secretary of the Army for installations, energy, and the environment, put it to EBN earlier this year, "Energy security is mission critical."

It doesn't cost more

We feared that might all change when we saw that the most recent military appropriations legislation requires explicit justification for any spending on LEED above the Silver level. What's worse, this decision pretends to be about money but appears to have been made over certified wood credits. (Watch this space for in-depth coverage of the "wood wars" in coming weeks.)

Hammack is having none of it. In a call with reporters yesterday, she reiterated the Army's commitment to net-zero and LEED and gave an update about some of the progress that's already been made. "We're finding it does not cost more to design and construct to LEED" standards, Hammack said.

On the warpath for LEED

Will the Army then be submitting cost-benefit analyses for each project, as the legislation seems to require? Hammack said no.

"The challenge right now is one of education," she explained. "If a building got a Gold-level certification and we were striving for Silver, that does not mean there was an incremental cost. We're working to help prepare a report for Congress so they understand the benefit of high-performance buildings."

Hammack clearly views these benefits as, at least in part, financial.

Can they do this?

The legislation in question does have a loophole for LEED Gold and Platinum projects as long as they don't cost more. As we reported at the time, "Exceptions may also be made without a special waiver if achieving Gold or Platinum 'imposes no additional cost'."

That loophole is big enough to blithely drive a tank through without bothering to show ID at the checkpoint. You apparently don't have to prove that it didn't cost more--or the Army is interpreting it that way, at any rate, while working closely with Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta on "educating" Congress.

Build to the standard but don't certify?

Another reporter asked if you could bypass the requirements by building to LEED standards but not bothering with certification. Hammack wasn't warm to that idea.

"We like the LEED program because it gives another set of eyes on the construction details and helps guide the direction of architects and engineers," Hammack replied. "The cost of LEED certification is very minimal in comparison to the benefits of LEED certification and the recognition that the building has achieved certain goals."

Zero energy wasted on dithering

"With a limited amount of water, a limited amount of resources, and an increasing world population," Hammack said, "we need to improve our stewardship over the resources we have."

Most of the call with Hammack was devoted to the progress on net-zero pilot projects. She and the rest of the Army clearly are not wasting time on questions of whether to LEED or not to LEED.

Comments (6) | Send | | 3576 Views

Comments

The US wages wars for oil in order to "protect" the American Way of Life (AWOL = absent without leave from the Web of Life).

The Pentagon is the world's largest consumer of petroleum, and so control of the world's oil is necessary in order to control the world's oil in order to "protect" the American Way of Life (AWOL).

Half the Pentagon's oil goes to the Air Force, 85% of that for jet fuel to move fuel, personnel & weapons around the world in order to control the world's oil in order to keep fueling the war machine in order to "protect" the American Way of Life (AWOL).

The US military budget is now more than a Trillion dollars a year and larger than all the other military budgets on earth combined, requiring well more than half of total government revenues (that means your hard-earned money). This non-productive use of financial resources leaves the US well behind even "developing" nations in serving the common good, and undermines the economic health of the nation.

Which means that the "defense" of AWOL is the leading cause of economic collapse, lack of basic social services that every other industrialized democracy offers its citizens, global pollution, global warming and the consequent destruction of AWOL.

Additionally, the US Navy is the world's largest consumer of diesel fuel and now the largest user of "green" biodiesel from GMO soybeans that we can't sell to the EU because they don't trust its safety. As the largest converter of food to fuel, we are reducing the world's food supply, causing hunger, displacement and social unrest that fuels terrorism.

Which means that the "defense" of AWOL is perhaps the major cause of global strife that requires a defense of AWOL which is destroying AWOL.

Catch-22

"Greening" up the US military doesn't make it any less a tool of empire and global destruction.

Posted 2/2/12 7:56 PM by Robert Riversong
Robert,

While I appreciate your point of view regarding the military - anybody's military - you can't expect it to disappear "overnite".

That being the case, "greening" it is one way to reduce that trillion dollar annual cost and free up even a little more money for better causes - while also reducing the military's CO2 emissions which contribute to global warming.

Posted 2/3/12 9:54 AM by Tony Marshallsay
I don't think there's any evidence that the "greening" of the military reduces the military budget, or even those line item costs for fuel. If anything, I suspect it increases the cost. But this effort is not about cost-reduction nor about improving our world - it is about making the military more "resilient" in the face of peak oil and global petroleum market disruptions (such as Iran's threat to close the Gulf of Hormuz). It is about keeping the world's most powerful killing machine functioning and maintaining US hegemony over the resources, markets and economies of other nations. And it is our military and foreign policy which is perhaps the greatest deterrent to a national or global shift to a truly sustainable culture.

We CAN stop this madness, however, by refusing to pay taxes to fund it. Every American taxpayer is complicit in our military/industrial/government complex. I have refused to pay war taxes for 33 years. It really IS as simple as that, but it requires wisdom and courage.

Posted 2/6/12 1:45 PM by Robert Riversong
Oh those wood wars. It is a happier day when one can at least fantasize the Army being on the same side as Earth First!
Posted 2/6/12 6:11 PM by Avery Ray Colter
Paula and all.
While we may or may not support the overall goals of a military, the Army especially, and the other services to some extent, have taken the process of greening very seriously.

I don't think that I would be quite so cavalier in writing about this ("..That loophole is big enough to blithely drive a tank through..."). There are people's lives at stake in how the Army conducts it's business, as well as quite a bit of money. These folks are working very hard in a relatively hostile environment. They deserve a bit more respect, it seems.

jim

Posted 2/7/12 10:42 AM by Jim Newman
Jim, I didn't read Paula's tank analogy as implying any disrespect. I think she was just trying to capture the attitude of the Army in taking advantage of the loophole that Congress left them. I think she was actually cheering their approach.
Posted 2/7/12 1:23 PM by Nadav Malin
(Comment Moderation is enabled. Your comment will not appear until approved.)

   

http://www.buildinggreen.com/live/index.cfm/2012/2/2/Army-to-Congress-LEED-Do...

Design Within Limits: The Urban Agriculture Project - Forbes

Fusedesign Process

Design schematic courtesy Fusedesign.

Creativity thrives under constraint. That may sound oxymoronic, but poets have known it for centuries. It is hard to find a piece of free verse that outshines a well-executed traditional Shakespearian sonnet, despite the later conforming to a rigid structure of 14 iambic pentameter lines and a strict rhyme scheme. Rather than limit a poem’s beauty and power, the restrictions enhance it.

As with poetry, so with design. Really innovative products tend to be the end-result of a laborious, structured and often contentious process rather than the work of a lone genius “blue skying” on a whiteboard. Engineering, cost and logistical constraints figure front and center.

So when TED Senior Fellow Juliette LaMontagne launched her second “Breaker Challenge” to develop commercially viable urban agriculture products, she enlisted the help of some seasoned designers, including Bart Haney from fabled design studio Fuseproject. (Breaker Challenges bring together a small, interdisciplinary group of bright 18-24 year olds and teams them up with top-level professionals to develop fundable projects addressing major social issues. For the next three months, I will be shadowing the Breaker Urban Agriculture team. Read more about it here.)

Fusepoject’s design process has 8 steps, beginning with “Immersion” and “Research” and progressing all the way through “Validating the business behind the concept: Look at the market potential and how this idea scales as it enters the business realm.” (Somewhat strangely, as one Breaker participant pointed out, this vital step happens very late in the process.  In fact, it is step 7 out of 8. I remain unclear on why.) And each of these broadly defined steps contains within itself yet more layers of structure and process. It will be a demanding road for the young Breaker participants, but at least one with plenty of signposts.

Does it work? Well to judge from Fuseproject’s array of design triumphs the answer is a resounding yes. The studio has been the creative force behind some of the most innovative designs of recent years, including Jambox, an “intelligent wireless speaker and speakerphone,” the ultra-affordable One Laptop Per Child computer designs, and Herman Miller’s lowest cost ergonomic chair, the Sayl. The company also did the branding and packaging for New York City’s very successful free condom program.

Last Friday at AOL’s Qlabs’ offices in downtown Manhattan, Haney walked 13 eager Breaker participants through Fuseproject’s recent work for sneaker-maker Puma. The challenge? Reinvent the shoebox. And the new box had to be designed to work with existing “pick n’ pack” robots in Germany, assembly lines in China and retail distribution networks in the U.S. Twenty-one months, countless frequent flier miles and 2,000 ideas later the designers settled on a radical approach: get rid of the box entirely. Once it is fully deployed, Fuseproject’s “clever little bag” program will reduce Puma’s cardboard consumption by 65%, save an annual 1 million liters of water and 500,000 liters of gasoline, along with an undisclosed – but surely very significant – amount of money. Check out the video below to learn more about that project and hope that the suitably inspired Breaker participants can create something equally as innovative for their urban agriculture Challenge.


Follow Me on Twitter

 

http://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelnoer/2012/01/25/design-within-limits-the-u...

: The Amazing Tumor-Fighting Walnut

RELATED ARTICLES
/top_stories/article/43904

It is amazing how many seemingly obscure causes and effects there are in this world, and all it takes is a little creativity and perseverance to find them. Recently, scientists from the University of California (UC) in Davis found out that, at least in mice, eating walnuts can actually slow down the growth of tumors. In fact, after 18 weeks of being on a walnut-rich diet, the mice had tumors half the size as mice on a similar diet. Further research will be upcoming to explore more beneficial effects of walnuts. Some believe that walnuts can be even used to prevent tumors from ever forming.

ADVERTISEMENT

Walnut image via Shutterstock

More: http://www.enn.com/top_stories/article/43904

Travelmole: Human rights and tourism who cares and who should care

Human rights and tourism who cares and who should care

So far, the process of public awareness rising has been successful: the debate on human rights in tourism is in full swing. NGO and representatives of the tourism industry and governments are hosting meetings to discuss the challenges and opportunities highlighting how the tourism industry, as one of the world´s largest services industries, has an obligation to engage more with human rights protection.

However, I wonder if the "normal" tourist, i.e. not the so called "conscious traveler", does care at all about the human rights impact of her/his trip. Or, in other words, if that normal tourist does at all understand the possible connection between the all-inclusive-trip to the Maldives or Canary Islands and human rights violations that might happen to make this trip worth the money paid.

Obviously, this is a big step. Can we ask anybody to think beyond the fences of the holiday resort? That is, to think about how little the farmers earn who produce the food at the buffet; how water is redirected to the tourism location leaving local people without enough water; how many people might have been forcibly displaced for the construction of the hotel; how unfair hotel staff might be treated, how women employees might be harassed; how local people are denied access to the beach that has been occupied by the resort? Et cetera.

...

more: http://www.travelmole.com/news_feature.php?news_id=1150880

TED Blog | Waterwise: Fellows Friday with Sonaar Luthra

TED Blog

Main

13 January 2012

Waterwise: Fellows Friday with Sonaar Luthra

Sonaar Luthra

Sonaar Luthra is packing water-safety analysis and mobile networking into the Water Canary — a handheld, open-source, and easy-to-use gadget accessible to all — hoping to save lives and gather information that will improve global water health.

You have a background as a writer, educator and journalist. How did you end up creating the Water Canary?

I went to NYU’s Interactive Telecommunications Program (ITP) because I realized that so many of the social outcomes I was after as an educator and journalist could be better accomplished by designing better tools. I wanted to come up with some way of becoming what I was calling an “urban planner for the global village.” At that point, I was thinking about tools that could transform classrooms, but it was really a bigger vision than that.

I fell in love with circuitry and with making tangible objects that had real functionality. Next thing I knew, I found myself in a class called Design for UNICEF, taught by Clay Shirky in association with UNICEF’s Innovations Lab. We were looking at ways to leverage technology and telecommunications strategies to transform the work that UNICEF does in the field. This was just as things like Ushahidi (an open source project that lets users crowdsource crisis information via mobile) were beginning to gain traction. People were just starting to realize the potential of leveraging mobile phones. I was interested in other ways we might design social interventions that relied on simple but important pieces of information. I wanted to see what was possible with water, and I was lucky to have an incredible team and the support of faculty that were willing to take on such a huge challenge. We started off as novices but we all became water experts in the process.

Water Canary prototype

Water Canary prototype. Click to see larger image. Photo: Water Canary

Why water?

My parents immigrated to Minnesota, but I used to spend summers in Delhi when I was a kid and worked there as a journalist, so it’s like home to me. I grew up seeing my grandfather getting up every morning at 5am to boil water, but not understanding why. I always found water safety confusing.

When I dug deeper, every document I read inevitably acknowledged that, even with the Millennium Development Goals, there was a complete lack of information about water. We had some information about water scarcity and depleting freshwater supplies, but almost nothing about water quality. I wondered, “What would happen if you knew whether your water was safe or not? What would that knowledge do in a city like New Delhi?” You can’t really excuse the lack of safe water there. It’s no longer a money issue. I decided it was really a matter of there being not enough demand for infrastructure — maybe if people had more information we could transform that.

So the idea behind the Water Canary was an inexpensive gadget that could instantly tell you whether your water was safe or not with a red light or green light, so you don’t have to be literate to use it. Over time, it occurred to us that what we really had was something that could transform disaster response with real-time information. This was right around the time when the Haiti earthquake happened. In emergencies, the assumption that every aid organization has to make is that all water is unsafe. And that leads to the entire response being completely inefficient. They never really know where help is needed. So it means you end up sending too many supplies to places that don’t need them, and that there’s never enough in areas that do.

It started out as a very simple device just for testing whether or not there was a high concentration of bacteria in the water, but that has expanded into detecting nutrient pollution and volatile chemicals as well as microbiological contaminants.

Working on the Water Canary

At work on the Water Canary with Eric Rosenthal. Click to see larger image. Photo: Water Canary

How did you acquire the knowledge to create this device?

I worked very closely with a faculty member at NYU named Eric Rosenthal, who is kind of a genius in optics. He had never done anything with water. When I told him the idea, he told me he’d been working on a technology that might be able to do it affordably and generously taught me everything I needed to make it. It’s changed a lot over the years, but I still work very closely with Eric and he’s now the senior scientist at the company.

And how does the Water Canary actually work?

Right now, generally, if you’re going to test water, you use a chemical reaction that can take up to a day in an incubator. It’s very difficult to carry out for anyone who’s not extremely well trained, and almost impossible in a chaotic situation. The Water Canary uses spectral analysis — essentially shining light through a water sample and measuring what it absorbs — to form conclusions about what’s in the water. It’s fast and uses a microprocessor, so the raw data is captured in the unit, making it easy to transmit in real time. The GPS-tagged data can then be instantly transmitted, so that water safety information can instantly be shared with the world. This makes it possible to quickly identify and respond to hazards — protecting people and the environment and preventing full-scale disasters. Every other effort to link mobile phones to water testing has involved someone entering it into an application. The moment you introduce that step, it’s far less likely that the data will ever be shared, or accurate.

The data gathered will also help build an overall picture of world water health. When you’re distributing inexpensive and accurate devices to people all over the world and collecting lots of data, you’re setting up a system that could get better and better with every reading that you take. We’re starting off the way the weather service started — just as a system for predicting storms. Before we could predict storms, we had no agriculture security, we had food shortages. It was commonplace to lose ships at sea. So just having advanced warning of a storm was enough to transform the world we lived in.

Likewise, if we implement a system that very rapidly identifies a source of water contamination in real time, that in and of itself is extremely valuable. We’re not there yet, but once we’ve collected enough data, we’ll be able to go back even to legacy data and say, “Three years ago, there was benzene in this water.”

How has your business and distribution model evolved?

We originally thought our business would be to sell devices, instead we realized that an open source device and networked data provide us with a much better business model, as well as a way of building a community for sharing water quality information.

Water Canary prototype

Creating the Water Canary. Click to see larger size. Photo: David Arky

What next?

We’re getting the device ready for field testing, raising money to get there, and doing everything necessary to build the best device and community we can.

Who do you picture having Water Canaries? Relief and aid workers? Your grandfather?

I think about Water Canary devices the same way I think of flashlights and smoke detectors: they’re for everyone. Since they’re easy to use and affordable, I don’t see any reason why everyone shouldn’t have them. It’s clear that the most immediate need is for groups like water-testing professionals, scientists, NGOs, municipalities, and people that face unsafe water conditions every day, but that doesn’t mean that it won’t be something everyone eventually owns and uses. The way we designed the technology, it could just as easily be a handheld unit as something installed at the tap, or something you plug into an Android phone.

How does the Water Canary empower people?

It gives people knowledge and a chance to form their own conclusions. Instead of just telling people to use sanitation supplies, you’d make them available and let people make up their own minds whether or not to use them. It also gives people a means to investigate the world around them, and to have a say in what data goes into decisions that impact their quality of life. There’s a huge opportunity to engage ordinary people to collect scientific data to solve problems like this. Citizen science isn’t all that different from citizen journalism: all you need is the simple tool, like a cameraphone, that enables them to report on conditions they identify. In the end I think scientific instruments are just another form of information technology, like computers, and shifts like this become possible when we have the right tools.

Tell us about your experience of being a TED Fellow.

I’ve made incredible connections, both personally and professionally. Water Canary has formed relationships with people from so many fields and disciplines who care about water, the environment and human rights, and want us to succeed. That’s allowed us to put a lot of care into finding the right people to work with and laying a solid foundation for everything we’re going to accomplish in the next few years.

On the most basic level, it’s amazing to participate in a community that collectively has the potential to do almost anything. With so many of the Fellows, it’s not a matter of whether we’ll do something incredible together, but a matter of when. That’s a huge source of motivation because it takes away so much of the isolation you learn to expect when you’re trying to do something impossible.

There are many aspiring social entrepreneurs out there who are trying to take their passion and ideas to the next level. What one piece of advice would you give them, based on your own experience and successes?

I always come back to a William Blake quote: “If the fool would persist in folly he would become wise.” If you’re doing something worthwhile, chances are you don’t know what you’re doing and nobody can tell you the right way to do it. That will always be true, so it’s nothing to be ashamed of and it’s never a good excuse to give up. Committing to your idea means being willing to make a fool out of yourself in the process, and if you can embrace that you’ll come out on the other side with nothing to regret.

Bookmark and Share

Posted by Karen Eng | Permalink | Comment | Trackback

http://blog.ted.com/2012/01/13/waterwise-fellows-friday-with-sonaar-luthra/